Resources · Compare

How the model stacks up.

Most organisations already have a way of answering workforce questions: spreadsheets, a consultancy, the HR stack. Honest comparisons of where each one holds up, where it breaks, and where task-level intelligence changes the answer.

The short version

Six criteria, one pattern.

The detailed pages score each match-up in full, including where the alternatives win. This is the pattern underneath all of them.

CriterionSpreadsheetsConsultanciesHR techHuman Layer Lab
Task-level analysis of every role
A living model, updated continuously
Impact measured in hours of capacity
A team in the room, running the change
Speed to insight in minutes, not weeks
A living asset, not a stale report

Our assessment, argued in full on each comparison page, including where the alternatives are the right choice.

Why the approach matters

The usual routes are how most
AI initiatives end up abandoned.

88%
of organizations are already using AI
Source · McKinsey
42%
have abandoned most of their AI initiatives
Source · S&P Global
47%
of CHROs cannot measure AI's impact
Source · CHRO Association

Cited third-party figures. Sources: McKinsey State of AI 2025; S&P Global Market Intelligence 2025; CHRO Association 2026.

Judge it on your data

The fairest comparison is your own workforce.

Start with Discovery. We baseline your organisation task by task, and you can put the output next to anything a spreadsheet, consultancy or HR platform has given you.

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze traffic.