Take the processesyou run on.Rebuild them withAI inside.

Licences are the easy part. The scattered experiments your teams are running prove the appetite, but a licence does not tell you which processes are worth transforming, what the new workflow should be, or whether anything actually changed. The programme turns the licences you already pay for into processes that run differently, and it measures the difference.

No, and deliberately so. You do get a roadmap, but it is a by-product of the map and the traction data, not the deliverable. The deliverable is a process that runs differently, with adoption you can read from live systems. Strategy documents follow working processes far better than the other way round.

The ones with high volume, clear rules and painful handoffs: invoicing and billing, client or employee onboarding, proposal and report drafting, support triage, compliance checks, recurring reporting. But that is a pattern, not a prescription. The map scores your processes on value, feasibility and urgency, and the shortlist comes from your evidence, not our habit.

That is a dial you control, per process. Some clients run the programme themselves on the platform, with the graph holding the evidence and Anima doing the analysis. Most fold in solutions experts at key points: scenario design, agent builds, training, rollout, and domain specialists where a process demands them. And if you want it run end to end, a Human Layer Lab team delivers the whole cycle with your people confirming rather than compiling.

Access to the tools the process runs through, a process owner who will make time, and your people's honesty. The map only works if we hear how the work actually happens, including the workarounds. The people who do the work always know where the process really lives.

From the live systems, not surveys. Who is using the new workflow, how often, where it sticks and where it slips back to the old way. We review the numbers together at 30, 60 and 90 days after go-live, and the same data scores the remaining candidates for the next cycle.

The map is a fixed fee, from $8,000 USD, quoted on the call. Each process scenario is a fixed fee. Implementation is priced from the scenario before it starts, so the number you agree is the number you pay. Nothing is hourly, and nothing renews by default. All fees are quoted in USD.

Only when the processes justify it. Plenty of transformations stop at level one or two of the ladder: tools configured properly, AI connected to your systems. When agent workflows need real organisational context, the knowledge layer becomes worth building, and that work runs as its own programme, Build Your Company Brain, with its own map and its own fixed fees.

No. It replaces the re-typing, the chasing, the copy-paste between systems and the Friday spreadsheet. The operating model in every scenario is explicit about it: AI drafts, people decide. Everything an agent produces is prepared for a person to approve, not fired off on its own.

Then the scenario says so. Sometimes the honest answer is a simpler fix: a form, a rule, one deleted approval step. You would rather learn that in a two-week design than after an implementation, and it is exactly why the design is priced separately from the build.

Your data stays yours and is used only to run your engagement. Access is scoped and logged, we connect with the minimum permissions the work needs, and we never train on your data. Fuller security detail is available in our Trust Center and on request.

The map runs on the same platform and discipline as the Workforce AI Impact Assessment, so if you have already run the assessment, the map is largely done and the programme starts at prioritisation. When a transformation grows into building the full knowledge layer, that is Build Your Company Brain. If you want a senior operator embedded throughout, that is Forward Deployed.