Redesign your org to be AI-first
Once you know where AI changes the work, this programme redesigns the organisation around it: which roles merge, which evolve, which new ones emerge, and how teams restructure around freed capacity.
Scoped with you · runs on your confirmed graph
Most org redesigns move boxes. AI-first design moves work.
The classic organisational redesign is a structural exercise: spans and layers, reporting lines, a new operating model on a slide. The work itself, the actual tasks that fill everyone's week, is assumed to carry over unchanged into the new boxes. For decades that assumption held well enough. AI breaks it, because AI changes what the work is before you have decided who does it.
Designing AI-first means inverting the sequence. Start from the task layer: which tasks AI absorbs, which it augments, which stay distinctly human, and only then ask what roles those remaining bundles of work add up to. Done this way, the answers stop resembling the old chart with fewer heads. Overlapping roles combine into hybrids. Routine-heavy roles compress. And entirely new roles emerge from the freed capacity, which is the upside case most redesigns never even model.
Design the structure around the work AI leaves behind, not around the work you used to have.
The other failure mode of the big-bang restructure is certainty. A design is announced as a decree, the organisation discovers its flaws in production, and the correction costs more than the design. Scenarios are the honest alternative: every proposed change modelled on the graph first, capacity impact, skills required, people affected, transition path, so leadership decides between evidenced options rather than defending a guess. Agents propose; your people decide.
What this programme produces is a structure you can defend line by line, to the board and to the workforce, because every change traces to task-level evidence rather than to a template from someone else's transformation.
What this programme does.
Working from your confirmed graph, we model role compressions and hybrids task by task: where overlapping roles combine, where AI absorbs the routine work, and where entirely new roles emerge from the capacity freed.
Every proposed change is a scenario, not a decree: you see the capacity impact, the skills required, the people affected and the transition path before anything is committed. Agents propose, your people decide.
From kickoff to landed.
Scoped with you · runs on your confirmed graph
Constraints and scope agreed
Working from your confirmed Discovery baseline, we agree the design constraints: headcount, budget, timeline and red lines. The design space is honest from day one.
Compressions and hybrids, task by task
Role combinations, compressions and new roles are modelled directly on the graph, with two working sessions per department to pressure-test the options against reality.
Scenarios, not decrees
Each candidate design shows its capacity impact, skills required, people affected and transition path before anything is committed. Leadership chooses between evidenced options.
The target design, ready to run
The chosen structure lands with living JDs for every new and evolved role, and a transition roadmap with real dates, owners and coverage plans.
What you get.
Living documents, not slideware: every deliverable stays connected to the graph and updates as the analysis moves.
Target org design
The AI-first structure, with every change traceable to task-level evidence.
Living JDs for changed roles
Generated for every new and evolved role, kept current as analysis moves.
Transition roadmap
Sequenced changes with real dates, owners and coverage plans.
What you need.
- A completed Discovery baseline on the areas in scope
- Your design constraints: headcount, budget, timeline, red lines
- Leadership time for two working sessions per department
The questions teams ask about this programme.
Do we need to run Discovery first?+
Yes, on the areas in scope. The design is only as defensible as the baseline it stands on: task-level evidence of what AI actually changes in your organisation, confirmed by your people. Designing without it is templating, whatever it is called.
Is this a headcount reduction exercise?+
It is a work redesign exercise, and freed capacity is one of its outputs. What you do with that capacity, growth, redeployment, reduction, is a leadership decision the scenarios make explicit rather than assume. Many clients find the new-roles picture as consequential as the compression picture.
How are the people affected handled?+
Every scenario shows exactly who is affected and what the transition path is: which skills carry over, what development is needed, and what the timeline looks like. Living JDs are generated for every changed role, so people see what their role becomes, not just that it changes.
How much leadership time does it take?+
Two working sessions per department in scope, plus the decision sessions on the scenarios. The modelling happens on the graph between sessions, so leadership time is spent deciding, not workshopping.
What if the board wants options rather than a single design?+
That is the natural next step: the Board Scenarios programme packages the design work into two or three costed options, aggressive, balanced and conservative, with the do-nothing baseline priced alongside.
Programmes compound.
Each programme deepens the same graph the next one runs on: nothing is re-gathered, nothing starts from zero.
Build transformation scenarios for your board
A target design becomes a decision when it is costed as options: build the scenarios the board can actually approve.
View programmeExplore next
Transform
Redesign the org around what AI now does.
Read moreBuild transformation scenarios for your board
Costed options, ready for the boardroom
Read moreCreate a rightsizing plan mapped to your processes
Capacity decisions grounded in real workflows
Read moreWhat Is an AI Transformation Platform? The Buyer's Guide
Someone searching for an AI transformation platform wants to evaluate their options. Here's what the category actually means, what to look for, and how to avoid buying the wrong thing.
Read moreAI Transformation Strategy: The Discovery, Transform, Traction Framework
Most AI strategies start with tools. Effective ones start with intelligence. A three-phase framework for AI workforce transformation that actually works.
Read moreEngagements
How an engagement runs, week by week.
Read more
Start with this programme, on one department.
A structure designed around what AI actually changes, with the evidence to defend every decision.



